Tag Archives: Torah

With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility

2 Aug

 

Rabbi David Blau (left), new Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel and Pope Francis (right) each have displayed different approaches to the Spider-Man credo, "With great power comes great responsibility."

Rabbi David Blau (left), new Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel and Pope Francis (right) each have displayed different approaches to the Spider-Man credo, “With great power comes great responsibility.”

 

My children enjoy a good superhero film, as do I. The magnetic appeal that superheroes have on pop-culture may be best summed up by Spider-Man’s Uncle Ben. In his dying breath told his powerful nephew, “With great power comes great responsibility.” There are many claims as to the source that inspired Spider-Man creator Stan Lee to use that statement. I’d like to suggest that the sentiment behind “With great power comes great responsibility” is rooted in the Torah.

More than any other book of the Torah, the book of Deuteronomy is concerned with social justice. Time and again, Deuteronomy expresses concern for the weakest, most vulnerable members of Israelite society: the stranger, the widow, the orphan, the poor and the Levites who were a landless class who subsisted on the donations of the rest of the nation. Other parts of the Torah call for caring for the weak and vulnerable. The book of Leviticus, particularly Chapter 19, frames helping the weak in terms of holiness; the Israelites are set apart through their virtue. The narratives of Genesis and Exodus highlight the triumph of the underdog who taps into inner strength and courage to overcome incredible odds. Deuteronomy takes the advocacy of social justice to another level. It appeals to the people’s empathy. We are reminded repeatedly that the Israelites were strangers and slaves in Egypt. Therefore, they must remember the suffering of the stranger in their midst. As the Israelites become a strong nation in their own right, it is as if Moses reminds them “With great power comes great responsibility.”

Parashat Re’eh hits on this theme at various points. Chapters 14 and 15 address social justice issues explicitly. The aide to the Levites, the remission of debts, the call to lend to the poor and the freeing of slaves all appeal to the nation’s empathy. What is striking is that even in Chapter 16, which is concerned with the observance of the pilgrimage festivals, the Torah appeals to the Exodus experience. Regarding the middle festival, Shavuot, (vv. 9-12) the Torah describes a highly egalitarian celebration:

You shall rejoice before the Lord your God with your son and daughter, your male and female slave, the Levite in your communities, and the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow in your midst, at the place where the Lord your God will choose to establish His name. Bear in mind that you were slaves in Egypt, and take care to obey these laws.”

How striking it is indeed that even in describing a ritual observance, the Torah appeals to empathy and social justice. The great responsibility on the shoulders of the nation is to live an exemplary, ethical life in their daily activities and in ritual observance. Rabbinic Judaism classifies two kinds of law: mitzvot bein adam l’Makom, commandments between people and God (ritual laws), and mitzvot bein adam l’chaveiro, commandments concerning interpersonal relationships. The Torah presents an ideal of laws governing ritual and interpersonal relationships complementing each other. By extension, one can reasonably conclude that responsible leaders of a religious community must embody these norms simultaneously. After all, with great power comes great responsibility.

This past week we saw snapshots of two different prominent religious leaders, each one of whom is fairly new on the global scene. I don’t know how much stock we should put in either of these snapshots, but they may offer a glimpse into larger character. The figures are Pope Francis and Rabbi David Lau, new Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel.

In a remarkable in-flight news conference on a flight from Brazil to Rome, a reporter asked about his stance on acceptance of priests who have a homosexual orientation. Prior Popes and other Church leaders might have retorted with hard line anti-gay Church doctrine. Instead, Pope Francis said “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” This humble statement of compassion towards gay Catholics who had previously felt ostracized by Church hierarchy was like a breath of fresh air to many Catholics. He did not change Church doctrine, but he sure did change the tone. A teacher of mine, Rabbi Brad Hirschfield, Co-President of CLAL, wrote on a blog this week:
“Who is he to judge? He’s the pope. Isn’t that part of his job?! He is the leader of a millennia old institution – one steeped in legal tradition and religious norms. How could he not judge? If not him, then who?

“Has Pope Francis become some kind of relativist? A post-modern paralytic unable to take a stand when asked what many would deem to be a straightforward question, and one with what many more would assume is an equally straightforward answer? Hardly.

“What Pope Francis did in answering as he did, was to distinguish between making a judgment and being judgmental.”

Rabbi Hirschfield elaborates and writes: “The ability to exercise judgment without becoming judgmental is fast becoming something of this pope’s trademark, so it should really come as no great surprise that he answered as he did.”

In contrast to the new Pope’s humility and non-judgmentalism, Israelis this week were treated to an ill-considered statement by the newly installed Ashkenazic Chief Rabbi, Rabbi David Lau. In a recorded interview for a Haredi news service, he exhorted yeshiva students not to waste time watching basketball games in neighborhood convenience stores when they should be in yeshiva studying Torah. He said: “Why do you care about whether the ‘kushim’ who get paid in Tel Aviv beat the ‘kushim’ who get paid in Greece?” In the Bible, Kush refers to Ethiopia, but in modern Israel ‘kushim’ is a derogatory word for anyone with black skin or of African descent. It is regarded by Israelis as equivalent to the “N” word in English or “shvartze” in Yiddish, terms that people of good will should shun. Derogatory terms such as these create a sense of “otherness” for people who are different. To paraphrase Martin Buber, our goal should be to seek “I-Thou” relationships where we regard fellow human beings as created in the image of God. Rabbi Lau later said his basketball comment was intended as a joke. Not too many people were laughing.

Rabbi Lau’s ill-considered remarks were more striking particularly as they stand in contrast to his father Rabbi Israel Meir Lau, who previously held the office of Chief Rabbi. While I was not a fan of the elder Rabbi Lau’s adherence to fervently Orthodox religious policies that I think are detrimental to the pluralistic character of Israel, I have great respect for him as a dignified man of character and integrity. Ironically, his legacy is linked with a prominent African American basketball legend, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, with whom he developed a friendship. At the age of eight, Rabbi Lau was liberated in Buchenwald by a US Army unit of African-American soldiers. A close friend of Abdul-Jabbar’s father personally liberated Rabbi Lau. The two found each other as Abdul-Jabbar was researching the legacy of this army unit and travelled to Israel to meet Rabbi Lau in 1997. It’s a great “feel-good” story of an Israeli rabbi befriending an African-American Muslim basketball star. Based on the younger Rabbi Lau’s first week on the job in which he denigrated black basketball players, he could learn a lot from his father.

Now, nobody is perfect; however, when you hold the title of Chief Rabbi, I think it’s fair for the public to expect more consideration and thoughtfulness, especially in your first week on the job.

This week we got two glimpses of different models of religious leadership. The Pope displayed humility and sound judgment. The Chief Rabbi displayed a parochial and doctrinaire judgmentalism. I’d suggest he get some executive coaching from Pope Francis. For religious leaders of all faiths, our Torah portion this week teaches us three things: Remember where you came from; remember we are all God’s creatures; remember that with great power comes great responsibility.

#TieBlog #Re’eh

31 Jul
Parashat Re'eh--Look and see

Parashat Re’eh–Look and see

The “eye chart” tie relates to the very first word of this week’s portion: Re’eh/ Look/See. As Moses addresses the Israelites throughout the book of Deuteronomy, he appeals to multiple senses. Many of us are well familiar with Deuteronomy 6: 4, Sh’ma Yisrael/ Listen up, Israel! Adonai is our God. Adonai is one. In the opening to this week’s Torah portion, Moses appeals to the sense of sight in laying out the choice faced by the Israelites: Re’eh/ Look (folks)! I set before you blessing and curse: blessing, if you obey the commandments of the Lord your God that I enjoin upon you this day; and curse, if you do not obey the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn away from the path that I enjoin upon you this day and follow other gods, whom you have not experienced.

Teaching Our Children to Create a Better World

19 Jul
President Obama on aftermath of Zimmerman acquittal

President Obama on aftermath of Zimmerman acquittal

Over the past week, there has been much news coverage in all the media devoted to the acquittal George Zimmerman in the killing of Trayvon Martin. For a year and a half, the case produced headlines on a range of hot-button issues: racial profiling and race relations, gun control and due process of law. We are all familiar with the basic tragic facts of the case. A teenage African-American boy was killed by gunshot in a confrontation with a white volunteer patrol officer. At the same time, Americans of good faith have drawn different conclusions about what the case means, particularly in the aftermath of the verdict. The court trial dealt with legal questions such as criminal intent and self-defense. The court of public opinion is wrestling with larger moral questions that transcend the case itself. We as Jews need to wrestle with these questions as religious challenges. What role do racial stereotypes play in our personal and collective decision making? What are appropriate boundaries of self-defense? By extension, is “stand your ground” an acceptable Jewish principle? As one rabbinic colleague wrote in a blog post: When two people stand their ground, you have a stand off where only 1 person can win. There’s always a loser. Since nobody wants to lose, each person raises the stakes. In this case, the stakes were raised so high that only one of them would come out alive. Nobody felt an obligation to stand down, to de-escalate, to walk away, which was what the dispatcher had told Zimmerman to do. It was a tragic inability to de-escalate.

I am pleased that during the trial and over the last week, demonstrations have been peaceful and that Americans of all perspectives are airing opinions in ways befitting a democratic society committed to the rule of law. We have grown a lot as a nation in over 200 years of American history, but we still have a lot of healing to do. One possible path to healing is found squarely in our Torah reading this Shabbat.

In Parashat Vaetchanan, we read the most central passage in Jewish consciousness: the Shema: Shma Yisrael Hashem Eloheinu Hashem Echad. And you shall love… V’shinantam l’vanecha v’dibarta bam. You shall teach them diligently to your children. This passage, which was lifted from the Torah and made the centerpiece of Jewish prayer, emphasizes teaching our children the mitzvoth, the commandments, that God has bestowed upon us.

The Rabbis in Midrash Sifrei comment on this verse to say that the Torah is not only referring to one’s own biological children. Of course any parent should teach Torah values to their children. Why would the Torah take the trouble to say something so obvious? Instead, the midrash says, ata motze b’kol makom she’ha talmidim kruyim vanim—students are always referred to as children. And since we are all students of one another, “You shall teach them diligently to your children” refers to anyone whose impression of Judaism is likely to be shaped by their contact with you. We are all students or potential students of one another. We all have responsibility as both teachers and pupils. How we act towards people sets an example for others. This is a high responsibility.

I follow a Facebook page by Susan Cain, author of the acclaimed book “Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking.” The book itself is worthy of a full discussion on another occasion, something I plan to do. In the meantime, Cain posted a powerful piece by another author on her Facebook page that for me is so appropriate this week.
Children Learn What They Live
By Dorothy Law Nolte, Ph.D.

If children live with criticism, they learn to condemn.
If children live with hostility, they learn to fight.
If children live with fear, they learn to be apprehensive.
If children live with pity, they learn to feel sorry for themselves.
If children live with ridicule, they learn to feel shy.
If children live with jealousy, they learn to feel envy.
If children live with shame, they learn to feel guilty.
If children live with encouragement, they learn confidence.
If children live with tolerance, they learn patience.
If children live with praise, they learn appreciation.
If children live with acceptance, they learn to love.
If children live with approval, they learn to like themselves.
If children live with recognition, they learn it is good to have a goal.
If children live with sharing, they learn generosity.
If children live with honesty, they learn truthfulness.
If children live with fairness, they learn justice.
If children live with kindness and consideration, they learn respect.
If children live with security, they learn to have faith in themselves and in those about them.
If children live with friendliness, they learn the world is a nice place in which to live.

In creating a decent community and society, we are all responsible for teaching and role modeling Jewish values for everyone of all ages, including and especially for the youngest among us. By adhering to v’shinantam l’vanecha, we cultivate a culture whereby we deal with conflicts that stand down and de-escalate conflict, rather than “stand your ground” and escalate conflict.

During the 1960s, amidst much turmoil in our society, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel said: “Some are guilty, but all are responsible.” In the case of the killing of Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman was found not guilty in a court of law. Among America’s great blessings are that a person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law and that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If the jury had reasonable doubt that Zimmerman committed a crime, then he should be a free man, and he is. He will not go to jail for the death of Trayvon Martin, and no one will. Yet, in some sense, we are all responsible for his death. We are responsible to teach and model patience, to teach and model loving kindness, to teach and model peace.

V’shinantam l’vanecha, you shall teach the values of Torah diligently to your children. The Torah calls on each of us to be a teacher so that we may together create a better world.

12 Jul

Yeshayahu Leibowitz, 1903-1994

A boat laden with a cargo of wine was attacked by a huge whale. The beast rammed the boat repeatedly and tossed it every which way. The Captain of the vessel feared that the boat might capsize. He ordered the crew to cast overboard the entire cargo. The cartons broke apart in the water and many bottles ended up in the belly of the whale. During the attack, a number of passengers, a Jew among them, were swept over the side and swallowed by the whale. The story has entered the annals of the legends of the sea because of its strange ending. Sometime after the attack on the boat, the body of a huge sea creature was washed ashore. Fishermen rushed to the carcass and began to cut it open. Inside its belly they found the Jewish man selling wine to his fellow passengers (From Rabbi Stanley Schachter, Laugh for God’s Sake: Where Jewish Humor and Jewish Ethics Meet, KTAV, 2008, p. 128).

The contrast of destruction and rebirth, implied in this story, is particularly poignant at this time of year. The period of the three weeks between 17 Tammuz and 9 Av is a solemn time that recalls the siege of Jerusalem and the subsequent destruction of the Temple by both the Babylonians in 586 BCE and the Romans in 70 CE. We are now in the climactic third week, having entered the month of Av this past week. The Mishnah in Tractate Taanit teaches: mi-shenichnas Av me’maatin b’simchah, whoever enters the month of Av reduces his or her joy. This is because of the prominence of Tisha B’Av and the various disasters associated with that day throughout Jewish history.

The late philosopher Yeshayahu Leibowitz (1903-1994, pictured above), notes that precisely at this time of year, we experience one of the great ironies in Jewish tradition. Namely, despite the somber tone set by the Jewish calendar at this time of year, the Torah reading during these three weeks deal largely with themes of promise and hope, particularly the settling and building of the Land of Israel.

Let us look for a moment at today’s reading, Parashat Devarim. The opening phrase of the first verse sets the scene: “These are the words that Moses addressed to all Israel on the other side of the Jordan” (Deut. 1:1). The Israelites have arrived to the banks of the Jordan and are prepared to enter the Promised Land. The entire book of Deuteronomy is essentially a series of sermons and laws that Moses addresses to the people before he dies. While many of Moses’s parting words are rebukes, chastisements, or curses, the underlying message is that the Israelites are about to start a new chapter. If they remain true to God, they will prosper in their new land. If they go astray, they will be punished. This theology of reward and punishment is one of the cornerstones of the book of Deuteronomy. Even as Moses warns the Israelites of the consequences of going astray from God’s path, they gaze upon their new homeland looking forward with high hopes for the new chapter in their lives. And yet, even as our Torah reading projects a message of hope for the future, we are marking this Shabbat as Shabbat Hazon, the Shabbat in which our Haftarah contains Isaiah’s vision of desolation and destruction.

The juxtaposition of hope and despair extends throughout the three weeks. Going back to Parashat Pinchas, we read two weeks ago about the apportionment of the land to the tribes and the petition of the daughters of Tzelofhad to inherit the land from their father in the absence of sons. Last week, in Parashat Matot, we read about the efforts of the tribes of Reuven, Gad and half of Menashe to settle the eastern side of the Jordan River and their pledge to fight in Israel proper for the right to do so. The parshiot of the last two weeks have devoted significant space to describing the borders and territories of Israel and the tribes poised to inhabit them.

And yet, precisely during this season, when we read in the Torah about the great promise of the Israelites building a homeland, our tradition bids us to recall the unraveling of that promise and the shattering of the dream. Prof. Leibowitz notes that the dream is fragile, and it is up to us as individuals and as a nation to make sure that we merit the fulfillment of the dream. At the same time, as the Jewish calendar bids us to recall the destruction of Jerusalem and other calamities in our history, our Torah reading remind us of the promise and the hope of building and maintaining a vibrant nation in the Land of Israel. The Jewish calendar and the Torah reading cycle, therefore, provide us with a healthy tension—a dialectic—between recalling destruction and maintaining hope for the futre.

Without our hope for the future that things can always get better, we never would have survived as a people. There was never any justification for our suffering and persecution; however, after every dark moment in our history, there was an opportunity to rebuild, even as the bitterness of our suffering has not been forgotten.

Dr. Ismar Schorsch, former Chancellor of JTS, writes that our sacred literature was key to our survival. Quoting David Ben-Gurion, he notes: “For 2000 years the Jewish people preserved the Book, even as the Book preserved the people.” Indeed many of the dark moments of our history resulted in the writing and compilation of the most important books of our tradition. The book of Deuteronomy, written as scholars believe in the late 7th century BCE, was a response to the fall of the Northern Kingdom of Israel in 722 BCE. The destruction of the First Temple and the fall of Judah in 586 BCE led to the promulgation of the Torah by Ezra in the fifth century BCE, as the Jewish nation began to reconstitute itself in the land of Israel. The fall of the second Temple in 70 CE spawned the canonization of the entire Tanakh (Hebrew Bible); the Bar Kokhba debacle of 135 CE brought about the editing of the Mishna around the year 200 and paved the way for the further development of Rabbinic Judaism.

From the abyss of destruction, arose great creativity. This theme has been repeated throughout Jewish history. The terrible Khmelnitzky pogroms in the Ukraine in the 17th century were followed by the development of Hasidism and new spiritual creativity in Jewish life. Of course, in the 20th century, the calamity of the Shoah was followed by the founding of the State of Israel. We sing in “Hatikvah,” the Israeli national anthem, od lo avdah tikvateinu, our hope was never lost. This captures the essence of the resiliency of the Jewish people.

Both Leibowitz and Schorsch note in various writings that our observance of Tisha B’Av is much greater than a mourning of the destruction of the Temple. If it were solely about the Temple, Tisha B’Av would be almost irrelevant for a religion that has thrived for 2,000 years without a Temple. Rather, Tisha B’Av encapsulates our mourning for all of the dark periods in our history. It provides a focal point of catharsis after which we can—indeed must—get on with our lives to continue building, dreaming and creating.

On this Shabbat Hazon, we hear the harsh words of Isaiah in the haunting melody of Eicha (Book of Lamenations). We brace ourselves for Tisha B’Av when we mourn so many of the dark periods in our history. And yet, we also read about the Israelites standing me’ever l’Yarden, on the banks of the Jordan River, ready to jump in and begin a new chapter of life. This juxtaposition reminds us that we should not be so distraught over our difficult times that we cannot get on with our lives. We must always strive to create a better future. At the same time, even at the peak of our creativity, we must remind ourselves of how fragile life is so that we may work harder to preserve it.

May God give us the strength to meet the challenge of Tisha B’Av and remember that despite the darkest days of our history, we will continue to thrive in our creativity and constant efforts to bring more justice and compassion into the world.

#TieBlog #Devarim

11 Jul

image

“These are the words which Moses spoke to all Israel on this side of the Jordan in the wilderness, in the Arabah opposite the Red Sea, between Paran, and Tophel, and Laban, and Hazeroth, and Dizahab” (Deuteronomy 1:1).

When Moses is first called upon by God to lead the Israelites out of Egypt he tries to get out of the task by saying he can’t speak. Now, 40 years later, Moses delivers to the people a long succession of speeches that are compiled in the book of Devarim/Deuteronomy. Moses has found his groove as a speaker, and he spends the fifth book of the Torah reminding the people of their sacred mission. His facility with Devarim/ words inspires this week’s crossword-themed tie.

28 Jun

image

Pinchas is the Torah’s “Dark Knight.” He is a vigilante who takes the law into his own hands. When the Israelites were seduced into a mass orgy by the Moabites, God and Moses are incensed. Pinchas is too and pushes the envelope by stabbing to death a prominent Israelite man and Moabite woman who are copulating in public. Parashat Pinchas begins with God rewarding Pinchas, grandson of Aaron the High Priest, with a Brit Shalom, a Covenant of Peace. The rabbis struggle to justify this reward when Pinchas acted outside of any legal jurisdiction to take such action. In the Jerusalem Talmud the rabbis go so far as to say that Pinchas should have been excommunicated were it not for God’s own intervention. Batman is a similarly complex figure who stands for justice but operates outside the established legal system. A Batman tie, therefore, seems apt this week.

#TieBlog #Korach

6 Jun

imageimage

Korach is grumpy about something. This Levite is jealous of the power and prestige of his cousins Moses and Aaron and stages a rebellion. With an assist from God, the rebellion fails miserably, and Korach and his comrades are swallowed by the earth. A few years ago during a family trip to Disney World, in one of the shops I found this tie featuring Grumpy from Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. It occurred to me that I coukd wear it for Parashat Korach whose namesake is the grumpiest person in the Torah. To be fair, Grumpy the Dwarf is not a sinister character; his name reflects more his disposition than his character. Still, one gets the sense Korach was an unhappy–and most especially grumpy person. Shabbat Shalom–and be happy!

#TieBlog The Book of #Numbers Parashat #Bemidbar

9 May

image

Another numbers tie? Well, that’s because we’re starting to read the Book of Numbers, or Sefer Bemidbar in Hebrew. Bemidbar literally means “in the desert.” The English name “Numbers” relates to the census of the people described in the opening of the book.

#TieBlog Go #Bulls!

5 May

Bulls

Ok, so it’s not exactly a tie connected to a Torah portion. I’m just showing some native Chicago pride in light of the Bulls advancing in the playoffs. Then again, I may recycle this tie when we read in the Torah about the Red Heifer.